CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 203×133×30 vs H-200x150x6x9-30.6

UB 203×133×30 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-200x150x6x9-30.6 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 314 cm³ against 309 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.6%. They weigh essentially the same, 30 kg/m and 30.6 kg/m. UB 203×133×30 is deeper, 206.8 mm against 194 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 203×133×30
UB
H-200x150x6x9-30.6
MB & MC
Difference
Mass30 kg/m30.6 kg/m-2.0%
Depth206.8 mm194 mm+6.6%
Width133.9 mm150 mm-10.7%
Web thickness6.4 mm6 mm+6.7%
Flange thickness9.6 mm9 mm+6.7%
Area38.2 cm²39 cm²-2.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)2,900 cm⁴2,690 cm⁴+7.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)314 cm³309 cm³+1.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)280 cm³277 cm³+1.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)385 cm⁴507 cm⁴-24.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)88.2 cm³104 cm³-15.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.17 cm3.61 cm-12.2%
Torsion constant (It)10.3 cm⁴10.9 cm⁴-5.5%

UB 203×133×30 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-200x150x6x9-30.6 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-200x150x6x9-30.6.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 203×133×30 has the larger second moment of area: 2,900 cm⁴ against 2,690 cm⁴, a difference of 7.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 203×133×30 is the more efficient section: 10.5 against 10.1 cm³ per kg/m, 3.7% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-200x150x6x9-30.6 has 104 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 88.2 cm³, 15.2% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 203×133×30 has a plastic modulus of 314 cm³ and H-200x150x6x9-30.6 has 309 cm³, a difference of only 1.6% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 203×133×30 is 30 kg/m and H-200x150x6x9-30.6 is 30.6 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-200x150x6x9-30.6 gives 309 cm³ of plastic modulus and 2,690 cm⁴ of inertia against 314 cm³ and 2,900 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 203×133×30, with a second moment of area of 2,900 cm⁴ against 2,690 cm⁴ (7.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 203×133×30 vs S 8X23
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…