CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 254×102×22 vs W 10X15

UB 254×102×22 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 10X15 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 259 cm³ against 262.19 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.2%. They weigh essentially the same, 22 kg/m and 22.3 kg/m. Both are about 254 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 254×102×22
UB
W 10X15
W
Difference
Mass22 kg/m22.3 kg/m-1.3%
Depth254 mm253.7 mm+0.1%
Width101.6 mm101.6 mmsame
Web thickness5.7 mm5.8 mm-1.7%
Flange thickness6.8 mm6.9 mm-1.4%
Area28 cm²28.5 cm²-1.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)2,840 cm⁴2,868 cm⁴-1.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)259 cm³262.19 cm³-1.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)224 cm³226.14 cm³-0.9%
Second moment, minor (Iz)119 cm⁴120.3 cm⁴-1.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)37.3 cm³37.69 cm³-1.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.06 cm2.06 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)4.15 cm⁴4.33 cm⁴-4.2%

UB 254×102×22 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 10X15 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 10X15.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 10X15 has the larger second moment of area: 2,868 cm⁴ against 2,840 cm⁴, a difference of 1.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (11.8 against 11.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 254×102×22 has a plastic modulus of 259 cm³ and W 10X15 has 262.19 cm³, a difference of only 1.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 254×102×22 is 22 kg/m and W 10X15 is 22.3 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 10X15 gives 262.19 cm³ of plastic modulus and 2,868 cm⁴ of inertia against 259 cm³ and 2,840 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 10X15, with a second moment of area of 2,868 cm⁴ against 2,840 cm⁴ (1.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…