CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 305×127×37 vs H-300x150x6.5x9

UB 305×127×37 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-300x150x6.5x9 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 539 cm³ against 542 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.6%. They weigh essentially the same, 37 kg/m and 36.7 kg/m. Both are about 302 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 305×127×37
UB
H-300x150x6.5x9
MB & MC
Difference
Mass37 kg/m36.7 kg/m+0.8%
Depth304.4 mm300 mm+1.5%
Width123.4 mm150 mm-17.7%
Web thickness7.1 mm6.5 mm+9.2%
Flange thickness10.7 mm9 mm+18.9%
Area47.1 cm²46.8 cm²+0.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)7,170 cm⁴7,210 cm⁴-0.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)539 cm³542 cm³-0.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)471 cm³481 cm³-2.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)336 cm⁴508 cm⁴-33.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)85.4 cm³105 cm³-18.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.67 cm3.29 cm-18.8%
Torsion constant (It)14.8 cm⁴12.4 cm⁴+19.4%

UB 305×127×37 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-300x150x6.5x9 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-300x150x6.5x9.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-300x150x6.5x9 has the larger second moment of area: 7,210 cm⁴ against 7,170 cm⁴, a difference of 0.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (14.6 against 14.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-300x150x6.5x9 has 105 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 85.4 cm³, 18.7% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 305×127×37 has a plastic modulus of 539 cm³ and H-300x150x6.5x9 has 542 cm³, a difference of only 0.6% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 305×127×37 is 37 kg/m and H-300x150x6.5x9 is 36.7 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-300x150x6.5x9 gives 542 cm³ of plastic modulus and 7,210 cm⁴ of inertia against 539 cm³ and 7,170 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-300x150x6.5x9, with a second moment of area of 7,210 cm⁴ against 7,170 cm⁴ (0.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 305×127×37 vs IPE A 300
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…