CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 305×127×48 vs S 12X35

UB 305×127×48 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); S 12X35 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. S 12X35 carries more bending: 730.86 cm³ of plastic modulus against 711 cm³, 2.7% more. UB 305×127×48 is the lighter of the two at 48.1 kg/m against 52.1 kg/m, a saving of 7.7% on steel weight. UB 305×127×48 is deeper, 311 mm against 304.8 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 305×127×48
UB
S 12X35
S
Difference
Mass48.1 kg/m52.1 kg/m-7.7%
Depth311 mm304.8 mm+2.0%
Width125.3 mm129 mm-2.9%
Web thickness9 mm10.9 mm-17.4%
Flange thickness14 mm13.8 mm+1.4%
Area61.3 cm²65.8 cm²-6.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)9,570 cm⁴9,490 cm⁴+0.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)711 cm³730.86 cm³-2.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)616 cm³624.35 cm³-1.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)461 cm⁴409.6 cm⁴+12.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)116 cm³111.43 cm³+4.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.74 cm2.49 cm+10.0%
Torsion constant (It)31.8 cm⁴43.7 cm⁴-27.2%

UB 305×127×48 to BS EN 10365:2017; S 12X35 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to S 12X35.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 305×127×48 has the larger second moment of area: 9,570 cm⁴ against 9,490 cm⁴, a difference of 0.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 305×127×48 is the more efficient section: 14.8 against 14.0 cm³ per kg/m, 5.4% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and S to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 7.7% weight.

In short, S 12X35 is the stronger section and UB 305×127×48 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

S 12X35 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 730.86 cm³ against 711 cm³ - 2.7% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

UB 305×127×48 at 48.1 kg/m, against 52.1 kg/m for the other - a saving of 7.7%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: S 12X35 gives 730.86 cm³ of plastic modulus and 9,490 cm⁴ of inertia against 711 cm³ and 9,570 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 305×127×48, with a second moment of area of 9,570 cm⁴ against 9,490 cm⁴ (0.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 305×165×46 vs S 12X35UB 305×127×48 vs IPE A 330UB 305×127×48 vs W 12X30UB 305×127×48 vs H-300x150x7.5x12
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…