CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 305×127×48 vs IPE A 330

UB 305×127×48 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); IPE A 330 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 711 cm³ against 702 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.3%. IPE A 330 is the lighter of the two at 43 kg/m against 48.1 kg/m, a saving of 11.9% on steel weight. IPE A 330 is deeper, 327 mm against 311 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 305×127×48
UB
IPE A 330
IPE
Difference
Mass48.1 kg/m43 kg/m+11.9%
Depth311 mm327 mm-4.9%
Width125.3 mm160 mm-21.7%
Web thickness9 mm6.5 mm+38.5%
Flange thickness14 mm10 mm+40.0%
Area61.3 cm²54.7 cm²+12.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)9,570 cm⁴10,200 cm⁴-6.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)711 cm³702 cm³+1.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)616 cm³626 cm³-1.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)461 cm⁴685 cm⁴-32.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)116 cm³133 cm³-12.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.74 cm3.54 cm-22.6%
Torsion constant (It)31.8 cm⁴19.6 cm⁴+62.2%

UB 305×127×48 to BS EN 10365:2017; IPE A 330 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE A 330.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, IPE A 330 has the larger second moment of area: 10,200 cm⁴ against 9,570 cm⁴, a difference of 6.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, IPE A 330 is the more efficient section: 16.3 against 14.8 cm³ per kg/m, 9.5% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: IPE A 330 has 133 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 116 cm³, 12.8% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 11.9% weight.

In short, UB 305×127×48 is the stronger section and IPE A 330 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 305×127×48 has a plastic modulus of 711 cm³ and IPE A 330 has 702 cm³, a difference of only 1.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

IPE A 330 at 43 kg/m, against 48.1 kg/m for the other - a saving of 11.9%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE A 330 gives 702 cm³ of plastic modulus and 10,200 cm⁴ of inertia against 711 cm³ and 9,570 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

IPE A 330, with a second moment of area of 10,200 cm⁴ against 9,570 cm⁴ (6.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 305×127×48 vs W 12X30UB 305×127×48 vs S 12X35UB 305×127×48 vs H-300x150x7.5x12W 12X30 vs IPE A 330
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…