CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 457×152×67 vs H-450x200x8x12-66.2

UB 457×152×67 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-450x200x8x12-66.2 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1450 cm³ against 1450 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 67.2 kg/m and 66.2 kg/m. UB 457×152×67 is deeper, 458 mm against 446 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 457×152×67
UB
H-450x200x8x12-66.2
MB & MC
Difference
Mass67.2 kg/m66.2 kg/m+1.5%
Depth458 mm446 mm+2.7%
Width153.8 mm199 mm-22.7%
Web thickness9 mm8 mm+12.5%
Flange thickness15 mm12 mm+25.0%
Area85.6 cm²84.3 cm²+1.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)28,900 cm⁴28,700 cm⁴+0.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,450 cm³1,450 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,260 cm³1,287 cm³-2.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)913 cm⁴1,581 cm⁴-42.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)187 cm³247 cm³-24.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.27 cm4.33 cm-24.5%
Torsion constant (It)47.7 cm⁴38.3 cm⁴+24.5%

UB 457×152×67 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-450x200x8x12-66.2 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-450x200x8x12-66.2.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 457×152×67 has the larger second moment of area: 28,900 cm⁴ against 28,700 cm⁴, a difference of 0.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (21.6 against 21.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-450x200x8x12-66.2 has 247 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 187 cm³, 24.3% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 457×152×67 has a plastic modulus of 1450 cm³ and H-450x200x8x12-66.2 has 1450 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 457×152×67 is 67.2 kg/m and H-450x200x8x12-66.2 is 66.2 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-450x200x8x12-66.2 gives 1450 cm³ of plastic modulus and 28,700 cm⁴ of inertia against 1450 cm³ and 28,900 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 457×152×67, with a second moment of area of 28,900 cm⁴ against 28,700 cm⁴ (0.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 457×191×67 vs H-450x200x8x12-66.2UB 457×152×67 vs IPE A 450UB 457×152×67 vs W 18X46W 18X46 vs H-450x200x8x12-66.2
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…