CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 457×152×67 vs W 18X46

UB 457×152×67 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 18X46 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. W 18X46 carries more bending: 1486.3 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1450 cm³, 2.4% more. They weigh essentially the same, 67.2 kg/m and 68.5 kg/m. Both are about 459 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 457×152×67
UB
W 18X46
W
Difference
Mass67.2 kg/m68.5 kg/m-1.9%
Depth458 mm459.7 mm-0.4%
Width153.8 mm153.9 mm-0.1%
Web thickness9 mm9.1 mm-1.1%
Flange thickness15 mm15.4 mm-2.6%
Area85.6 cm²87.1 cm²-1.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)28,900 cm⁴29,636 cm⁴-2.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,450 cm³1,486.3 cm³-2.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,260 cm³1,291.3 cm³-2.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)913 cm⁴936.5 cm⁴-2.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)187 cm³191.73 cm³-2.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.27 cm3.28 cm-0.3%
Torsion constant (It)47.7 cm⁴50.78 cm⁴-6.1%

UB 457×152×67 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 18X46 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 18X46.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 18X46 has the larger second moment of area: 29,636 cm⁴ against 28,900 cm⁴, a difference of 2.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (21.6 against 21.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, W 18X46 is the stronger section and UB 457×152×67 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 18X46 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1486.3 cm³ against 1450 cm³ - 2.4% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: UB 457×152×67 is 67.2 kg/m and W 18X46 is 68.5 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 18X46 gives 1486.3 cm³ of plastic modulus and 29,636 cm⁴ of inertia against 1450 cm³ and 28,900 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 18X46, with a second moment of area of 29,636 cm⁴ against 28,900 cm⁴ (2.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 457×191×67 vs W 18X46UB 457×152×67 vs IPE A 450UB 457×152×67 vs H-450x200x8x12-66.2W 18X46 vs IPE A 450W 18X46 vs H-450x200x8x12-66.2
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…