CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 457×191×67 vs W 18X46

UB 457×191×67 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 18X46 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1470 cm³ against 1486.3 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.1%. UB 457×191×67 is the lighter of the two at 67.1 kg/m against 68.5 kg/m, a saving of 2.0% on steel weight. Both are about 457 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 457×191×67
UB
W 18X46
W
Difference
Mass67.1 kg/m68.5 kg/m-2.0%
Depth453.4 mm459.7 mm-1.4%
Width189.9 mm153.9 mm+23.4%
Web thickness8.5 mm9.1 mm-6.6%
Flange thickness12.7 mm15.4 mm-17.5%
Area85.5 cm²87.1 cm²-1.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)29,400 cm⁴29,636 cm⁴-0.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,470 cm³1,486.3 cm³-1.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,300 cm³1,291.3 cm³+0.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,450 cm⁴936.5 cm⁴+54.8%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)237 cm³191.73 cm³+23.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.12 cm3.28 cm+25.6%
Torsion constant (It)37.1 cm⁴50.78 cm⁴-26.9%

UB 457×191×67 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 18X46 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 18X46.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 18X46 has the larger second moment of area: 29,636 cm⁴ against 29,400 cm⁴, a difference of 0.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (21.9 against 21.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UB 457×191×67 has 237 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 191.73 cm³, 23.6% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.0% weight.

In short, W 18X46 is the stronger section and UB 457×191×67 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 457×191×67 has a plastic modulus of 1470 cm³ and W 18X46 has 1486.3 cm³, a difference of only 1.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

UB 457×191×67 at 67.1 kg/m, against 68.5 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 18X46 gives 1486.3 cm³ of plastic modulus and 29,636 cm⁴ of inertia against 1470 cm³ and 29,400 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 18X46, with a second moment of area of 29,636 cm⁴ against 29,400 cm⁴ (0.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 457×191×67 vs IPE A 450UB 457×191×67 vs H-450x200x8x12-66.2UB 457×152×67 vs W 18X46W 18X46 vs IPE A 450W 18X46 vs H-450x200x8x12-66.2
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…