CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 533×312×151 vs W 21X101

UB 533×312×151 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 21X101 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 4150 cm³ against 4145.9 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 150.6 kg/m and 150.3 kg/m. Both are about 543 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 533×312×151
UB
W 21X101
W
Difference
Mass150.6 kg/m150.3 kg/m+0.2%
Depth542.5 mm543.6 mm-0.2%
Width312 mm312.4 mm-0.1%
Web thickness12.7 mm12.7 mmsame
Flange thickness20.3 mm20.3 mmsame
Area192 cm²192.3 cm²-0.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)101,000 cm⁴100,728 cm⁴+0.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)4,150 cm³4,145.9 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)3,710 cm³3,719.9 cm³-0.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)10,300 cm⁴10,323 cm⁴-0.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,010 cm³1,011.1 cm³-0.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.32 cm7.34 cm-0.3%
Torsion constant (It)216 cm⁴216.9 cm⁴-0.4%

UB 533×312×151 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 21X101 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 21X101.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 533×312×151 has the larger second moment of area: 101,000 cm⁴ against 100,728 cm⁴, a difference of 0.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (27.6 against 27.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 533×312×151 has a plastic modulus of 4150 cm³ and W 21X101 has 4145.9 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 533×312×151 is 150.6 kg/m and W 21X101 is 150.3 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 21X101 gives 4145.9 cm³ of plastic modulus and 100,728 cm⁴ of inertia against 4150 cm³ and 101,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 533×312×151, with a second moment of area of 101,000 cm⁴ against 100,728 cm⁴ (0.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 533×312×151 vs IPE V 550W 21X101 vs IPE V 550
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…