CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 533×312×219 vs W 21X147

UB 533×312×219 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 21X147 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 6120 cm³ against 6112.4 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 218.8 kg/m and 218.8 kg/m. Both are about 561 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 533×312×219
UB
W 21X147
W
Difference
Mass218.8 kg/m218.8 kg/msame
Depth560.3 mm561.3 mm-0.2%
Width317.4 mm317.5 mmsame
Web thickness18.3 mm18.3 mmsame
Flange thickness29.2 mm29.2 mmsame
Area279 cm²278.7 cm²+0.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)151,000 cm⁴151,092 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)6,120 cm³6,112.4 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)5,400 cm³5,391.3 cm³+0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)15,600 cm⁴15,650 cm⁴-0.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,510 cm³1,517.4 cm³-0.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.48 cm7.49 cm-0.1%
Torsion constant (It)642 cm⁴641 cm⁴+0.2%

UB 533×312×219 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 21X147 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 21X147.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 21X147 has the larger second moment of area: 151,092 cm⁴ against 151,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (28.0 against 27.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 533×312×219 has a plastic modulus of 6120 cm³ and W 21X147 has 6112.4 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 533×312×219 is 218.8 kg/m and W 21X147 is 218.8 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 21X147 gives 6112.4 cm³ of plastic modulus and 151,092 cm⁴ of inertia against 6120 cm³ and 151,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 21X147, with a second moment of area of 151,092 cm⁴ against 151,000 cm⁴ (0.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 533×312×219 vs H-600x300x16x27W 21X147 vs H-600x300x16x27
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…