CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 533×312×219 vs H-600x300x16x27

UB 533×312×219 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-600x300x16x27 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 6120 cm³ against 6101 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.3%. H-600x300x16x27 is the lighter of the two at 203 kg/m against 218.8 kg/m, a saving of 7.8% on steel weight. H-600x300x16x27 is deeper, 602 mm against 560.3 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 533×312×219
UB
H-600x300x16x27
MB & MC
Difference
Mass218.8 kg/m203 kg/m+7.8%
Depth560.3 mm602 mm-6.9%
Width317.4 mm304 mm+4.4%
Web thickness18.3 mm16 mm+14.4%
Flange thickness29.2 mm27 mm+8.1%
Area279 cm²259 cm²+7.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)151,000 cm⁴162,600 cm⁴-7.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)6,120 cm³6,101 cm³+0.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)5,400 cm³5,401 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)15,600 cm⁴12,680 cm⁴+23.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,510 cm³1,292 cm³+16.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.48 cm7 cm+6.9%
Torsion constant (It)642 cm⁴551 cm⁴+16.5%

UB 533×312×219 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-600x300x16x27 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-600x300x16x27.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-600x300x16x27 has the larger second moment of area: 162,600 cm⁴ against 151,000 cm⁴, a difference of 7.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-600x300x16x27 is the more efficient section: 30.1 against 28.0 cm³ per kg/m, 6.9% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UB 533×312×219 has 1510 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 1292 cm³, 16.9% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 7.8% weight.

In short, UB 533×312×219 is the stronger section and H-600x300x16x27 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 533×312×219 has a plastic modulus of 6120 cm³ and H-600x300x16x27 has 6101 cm³, a difference of only 0.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

H-600x300x16x27 at 203 kg/m, against 218.8 kg/m for the other - a saving of 7.8%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-600x300x16x27 gives 6101 cm³ of plastic modulus and 162,600 cm⁴ of inertia against 6120 cm³ and 151,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-600x300x16x27, with a second moment of area of 162,600 cm⁴ against 151,000 cm⁴ (7.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 533×312×219 vs W 21X147W 24X131 vs H-600x300x16x27W 21X147 vs H-600x300x16x27HE 650 A vs H-600x300x16x27
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…