CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 24X131 vs H-600x300x16x27

W 24X131 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-600x300x16x27 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 6063.2 cm³ against 6101 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.6%. W 24X131 is the lighter of the two at 194.9 kg/m against 203 kg/m, a saving of 4.0% on steel weight. W 24X131 is deeper, 622.3 mm against 602 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 24X131
W
H-600x300x16x27
MB & MC
Difference
Mass194.9 kg/m203 kg/m-4.0%
Depth622.3 mm602 mm+3.4%
Width327.7 mm304 mm+7.8%
Web thickness15.4 mm16 mm-3.7%
Flange thickness24.4 mm27 mm-9.6%
Area249 cm²259 cm²-3.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)167,325 cm⁴162,600 cm⁴+2.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)6,063.2 cm³6,101 cm³-0.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)5,391.3 cm³5,401 cm³-0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)14,152 cm⁴12,680 cm⁴+11.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,335.5 cm³1,292 cm³+3.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.54 cm7 cm+7.7%
Torsion constant (It)395.4 cm⁴551 cm⁴-28.2%

W 24X131 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-600x300x16x27 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-600x300x16x27.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 24X131 has the larger second moment of area: 167,325 cm⁴ against 162,600 cm⁴, a difference of 2.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 24X131 is the more efficient section: 31.1 against 30.1 cm³ per kg/m, 3.5% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.0% weight.

In short, H-600x300x16x27 is the stronger section and W 24X131 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 24X131 has a plastic modulus of 6063.2 cm³ and H-600x300x16x27 has 6101 cm³, a difference of only 0.6% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 24X131 at 194.9 kg/m, against 203 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-600x300x16x27 gives 6101 cm³ of plastic modulus and 162,600 cm⁴ of inertia against 6063.2 cm³ and 167,325 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 24X131, with a second moment of area of 167,325 cm⁴ against 162,600 cm⁴ (2.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 533×312×219 vs H-600x300x16x27W 24X131 vs HE 650 AW 21X147 vs H-600x300x16x27HE 650 A vs H-600x300x16x27
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…