CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 610×305×238 vs W 24X162

UB 610×305×238 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 24X162 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. W 24X162 carries more bending: 7669.1 cm³ of plastic modulus against 7490 cm³, 2.3% more. They weigh essentially the same, 238.1 kg/m and 241.1 kg/m. Both are about 635 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 610×305×238
UB
W 24X162
W
Difference
Mass238.1 kg/m241.1 kg/m-1.2%
Depth635.8 mm635 mm+0.1%
Width311.4 mm330.2 mm-5.7%
Web thickness18.4 mm17.9 mm+2.8%
Flange thickness31.4 mm31 mm+1.3%
Area303 cm²308.4 cm²-1.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)209,000 cm⁴215,192 cm⁴-2.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)7,490 cm³7,669.1 cm³-2.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)6,590 cm³6,784.2 cm³-2.9%
Second moment, minor (Iz)15,800 cm⁴18,439 cm⁴-14.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,570 cm³1,720.6 cm³-8.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.23 cm7.75 cm-6.7%
Torsion constant (It)785 cm⁴770 cm⁴+1.9%

UB 610×305×238 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 24X162 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 24X162.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 24X162 has the larger second moment of area: 215,192 cm⁴ against 209,000 cm⁴, a difference of 2.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (31.5 against 31.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 24X162 has 1720.6 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 1570 cm³, 8.8% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, W 24X162 is the stronger section and UB 610×305×238 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 24X162 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 7669.1 cm³ against 7490 cm³ - 2.3% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: UB 610×305×238 is 238.1 kg/m and W 24X162 is 241.1 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 24X162 gives 7669.1 cm³ of plastic modulus and 215,192 cm⁴ of inertia against 7490 cm³ and 209,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 24X162, with a second moment of area of 215,192 cm⁴ against 209,000 cm⁴ (2.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×305×238 vs HE 650 B
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…