CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 686×254×125 vs W 27X84

UB 686×254×125 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 27X84 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 3990 cm³ against 3998.4 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. They weigh essentially the same, 125.2 kg/m and 125 kg/m. Both are about 678 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 686×254×125
UB
W 27X84
W
Difference
Mass125.2 kg/m125 kg/m+0.2%
Depth677.9 mm678.2 mmsame
Width253 mm254 mm-0.4%
Web thickness11.7 mm11.7 mmsame
Flange thickness16.2 mm16.3 mm-0.6%
Area159 cm²159.4 cm²-0.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)118,000 cm⁴118,626 cm⁴-0.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,990 cm³3,998.4 cm³-0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)3,480 cm³3,490.4 cm³-0.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)4,380 cm⁴4,412 cm⁴-0.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)542 cm³544.05 cm³-0.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.24 cm5.26 cm-0.4%
Torsion constant (It)116 cm⁴117 cm⁴-0.9%

UB 686×254×125 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 27X84 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 27X84.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 27X84 has the larger second moment of area: 118,626 cm⁴ against 118,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (31.9 against 32.0 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 686×254×125 has a plastic modulus of 3990 cm³ and W 27X84 has 3998.4 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 686×254×125 is 125.2 kg/m and W 27X84 is 125 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 27X84 gives 3998.4 cm³ of plastic modulus and 118,626 cm⁴ of inertia against 3990 cm³ and 118,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 27X84, with a second moment of area of 118,626 cm⁴ against 118,000 cm⁴ (0.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…