CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 914×305×224 vs W 36X150

UB 914×305×224 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 36X150 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 9530 cm³ against 9520.9 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 224.2 kg/m and 223.2 kg/m. Both are about 911 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 914×305×224
UB
W 36X150
W
Difference
Mass224.2 kg/m223.2 kg/m+0.4%
Depth910.4 mm911.9 mm-0.2%
Width304.1 mm304.8 mm-0.2%
Web thickness15.9 mm15.9 mmsame
Flange thickness23.9 mm23.9 mmsame
Area286 cm²285.8 cm²+0.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)376,000 cm⁴376,273 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)9,530 cm³9,520.9 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)8,270 cm³8,259.1 cm³+0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)11,200 cm⁴11,238 cm⁴-0.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,160 cm³1,161.8 cm³-0.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.27 cm6.27 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)422 cm⁴420.4 cm⁴+0.4%

UB 914×305×224 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 36X150 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 36X150.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 36X150 has the larger second moment of area: 376,273 cm⁴ against 376,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (42.5 against 42.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 914×305×224 has a plastic modulus of 9530 cm³ and W 36X150 has 9520.9 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 914×305×224 is 224.2 kg/m and W 36X150 is 223.2 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 36X150 gives 9520.9 cm³ of plastic modulus and 376,273 cm⁴ of inertia against 9530 cm³ and 376,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 36X150, with a second moment of area of 376,273 cm⁴ against 376,000 cm⁴ (0.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…