CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 152×152×44 vs H-175x175x7.5x11-40.4

UC 152×152×44 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-175x175x7.5x11-40.4 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 372 cm³ against 370 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.5%. H-175x175x7.5x11-40.4 is the lighter of the two at 40.4 kg/m against 44 kg/m, a saving of 8.9% on steel weight. H-175x175x7.5x11-40.4 is deeper, 175 mm against 166 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 152×152×44
UC
H-175x175x7.5x11-40.4
MB & MC
Difference
Mass44 kg/m40.4 kg/m+8.9%
Depth166 mm175 mm-5.1%
Width155.9 mm175 mm-10.9%
Web thickness9.5 mm7.5 mm+26.7%
Flange thickness13.6 mm11 mm+23.6%
Area56.1 cm²51.4 cm²+9.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)2,700 cm⁴2,895 cm⁴-6.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)372 cm³370 cm³+0.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)326 cm³331 cm³-1.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)860 cm⁴984 cm⁴-12.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)169 cm³172 cm³-1.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.92 cm4.37 cm-10.3%
Torsion constant (It)31.7 cm⁴21 cm⁴+51.0%

UC 152×152×44 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-175x175x7.5x11-40.4 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-175x175x7.5x11-40.4.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-175x175x7.5x11-40.4 has the larger second moment of area: 2,895 cm⁴ against 2,700 cm⁴, a difference of 6.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-175x175x7.5x11-40.4 is the more efficient section: 9.2 against 8.5 cm³ per kg/m, 7.7% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 8.9% weight.

In short, UC 152×152×44 is the stronger section and H-175x175x7.5x11-40.4 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 152×152×44 has a plastic modulus of 372 cm³ and H-175x175x7.5x11-40.4 has 370 cm³, a difference of only 0.5% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

H-175x175x7.5x11-40.4 at 40.4 kg/m, against 44 kg/m for the other - a saving of 8.9%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-175x175x7.5x11-40.4 gives 370 cm³ of plastic modulus and 2,895 cm⁴ of inertia against 372 cm³ and 2,700 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-175x175x7.5x11-40.4, with a second moment of area of 2,895 cm⁴ against 2,700 cm⁴ (6.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…