CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 203×203×46 vs W 8X31

UC 203×203×46 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 8X31 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 497 cm³ against 498.17 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. They weigh essentially the same, 46.1 kg/m and 46.1 kg/m. Both are about 203 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 203×203×46
UC
W 8X31
W
Difference
Mass46.1 kg/m46.1 kg/msame
Depth203.2 mm203.2 mmsame
Width203.6 mm203.2 mm+0.2%
Web thickness7.2 mm7.2 mmsame
Flange thickness11 mm11 mmsame
Area58.7 cm²58.9 cm²-0.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)4,570 cm⁴4,579 cm⁴-0.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)497 cm³498.17 cm³-0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)450 cm³450.64 cm³-0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,550 cm⁴1,544 cm⁴+0.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)231 cm³231.06 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.13 cm5.13 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)22.2 cm⁴22.31 cm⁴-0.5%

UC 203×203×46 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 8X31 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 8X31.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 8X31 has the larger second moment of area: 4,579 cm⁴ against 4,570 cm⁴, a difference of 0.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (10.8 against 10.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 203×203×46 has a plastic modulus of 497 cm³ and W 8X31 has 498.17 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UC 203×203×46 is 46.1 kg/m and W 8X31 is 46.1 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 8X31 gives 498.17 cm³ of plastic modulus and 4,579 cm⁴ of inertia against 497 cm³ and 4,570 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 8X31, with a second moment of area of 4,579 cm⁴ against 4,570 cm⁴ (0.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…