CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 203×203×86 vs W 8X58

UC 203×203×86 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 8X58 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 977 cm³ against 979.95 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.3%. They weigh essentially the same, 86.1 kg/m and 86.3 kg/m. Both are about 222 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 203×203×86
UC
W 8X58
W
Difference
Mass86.1 kg/m86.3 kg/m-0.2%
Depth222.2 mm222.3 mmsame
Width209.1 mm208.8 mm+0.1%
Web thickness12.7 mm13 mm-2.3%
Flange thickness20.5 mm20.6 mm-0.5%
Area110 cm²110.3 cm²-0.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)9,450 cm⁴9,490 cm⁴-0.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)977 cm³979.95 cm³-0.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)850 cm³852.13 cm³-0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)3,130 cm⁴3,126 cm⁴+0.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)456 cm³457.2 cm³-0.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.34 cm5.33 cm+0.2%
Torsion constant (It)137 cm⁴138.6 cm⁴-1.2%

UC 203×203×86 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 8X58 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 8X58.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 8X58 has the larger second moment of area: 9,490 cm⁴ against 9,450 cm⁴, a difference of 0.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (11.3 against 11.4 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 203×203×86 has a plastic modulus of 977 cm³ and W 8X58 has 979.95 cm³, a difference of only 0.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UC 203×203×86 is 86.1 kg/m and W 8X58 is 86.3 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 8X58 gives 979.95 cm³ of plastic modulus and 9,490 cm⁴ of inertia against 977 cm³ and 9,450 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 8X58, with a second moment of area of 9,490 cm⁴ against 9,450 cm⁴ (0.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…