CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 254×254×167 vs W 10X112

UC 254×254×167 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 10X112 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2420 cm³ against 2408.9 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.5%. They weigh essentially the same, 167.1 kg/m and 166.7 kg/m. Both are about 289 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 254×254×167
UC
W 10X112
W
Difference
Mass167.1 kg/m166.7 kg/m+0.2%
Depth289.1 mm289.6 mm-0.2%
Width265.2 mm264.2 mm+0.4%
Web thickness19.2 mm19.2 mmsame
Flange thickness31.7 mm31.8 mm-0.3%
Area213 cm²212.3 cm²+0.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)30,000 cm⁴29,802 cm⁴+0.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,420 cm³2,408.9 cm³+0.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,080 cm³2,064.8 cm³+0.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)9,870 cm⁴9,823 cm⁴+0.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,140 cm³1,134 cm³+0.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.81 cm6.81 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)626 cm⁴628.5 cm⁴-0.4%

UC 254×254×167 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 10X112 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 10X112.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UC 254×254×167 has the larger second moment of area: 30,000 cm⁴ against 29,802 cm⁴, a difference of 0.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (14.5 against 14.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 254×254×167 has a plastic modulus of 2420 cm³ and W 10X112 has 2408.9 cm³, a difference of only 0.5% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UC 254×254×167 is 167.1 kg/m and W 10X112 is 166.7 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 10X112 gives 2408.9 cm³ of plastic modulus and 29,802 cm⁴ of inertia against 2420 cm³ and 30,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UC 254×254×167, with a second moment of area of 30,000 cm⁴ against 29,802 cm⁴ (0.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 254×254×167 vs HE 260 MW 10X112 vs HE 260 M
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…