CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 305×305×137 vs H-300x300x20x21

UC 305×305×137 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-300x300x20x21 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2300 cm³ against 2295 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. UC 305×305×137 is the lighter of the two at 136.9 kg/m against 147 kg/m, a saving of 6.9% on steel weight. UC 305×305×137 is deeper, 320.5 mm against 312 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 305×305×137
UC
H-300x300x20x21
MB & MC
Difference
Mass136.9 kg/m147 kg/m-6.9%
Depth320.5 mm312 mm+2.7%
Width309.2 mm310 mm-0.3%
Web thickness13.8 mm20 mm-31.0%
Flange thickness21.7 mm21 mm+3.3%
Area174 cm²187 cm²-7.0%
Second moment, major (Iy)32,800 cm⁴31,370 cm⁴+4.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,300 cm³2,295 cm³+0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,050 cm³2,011 cm³+1.9%
Second moment, minor (Iz)10,700 cm⁴10,450 cm⁴+2.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,050 cm³1,040 cm³+1.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.83 cm7.48 cm+4.7%
Torsion constant (It)249 cm⁴298 cm⁴-16.4%

UC 305×305×137 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-300x300x20x21 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-300x300x20x21.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UC 305×305×137 has the larger second moment of area: 32,800 cm⁴ against 31,370 cm⁴, a difference of 4.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UC 305×305×137 is the more efficient section: 16.8 against 15.6 cm³ per kg/m, 7.6% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 6.9% weight.

In short, UC 305×305×137 is the stronger section and UC 305×305×137 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 305×305×137 has a plastic modulus of 2300 cm³ and H-300x300x20x21 has 2295 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

UC 305×305×137 at 136.9 kg/m, against 147 kg/m for the other - a saving of 6.9%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-300x300x20x21 gives 2295 cm³ of plastic modulus and 31,370 cm⁴ of inertia against 2300 cm³ and 32,800 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UC 305×305×137, with a second moment of area of 32,800 cm⁴ against 31,370 cm⁴ (4.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 305×305×137 vs W 12X96
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…