CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 305×305×240 vs HE 320 M

UC 305×305×240 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); HE 320 M is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. HE 320 M carries more bending: 4440 cm³ of plastic modulus against 4250 cm³, 4.3% more. UC 305×305×240 is the lighter of the two at 240 kg/m against 245 kg/m, a saving of 2.0% on steel weight. Both are about 356 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 305×305×240
UC
HE 320 M
HE
Difference
Mass240 kg/m245 kg/m-2.0%
Depth352.5 mm359 mm-1.8%
Width318.4 mm309 mm+3.0%
Web thickness23 mm21 mm+9.5%
Flange thickness37.7 mm40 mm-5.7%
Area306 cm²312 cm²-1.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)64,200 cm⁴68,100 cm⁴-5.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)4,250 cm³4,440 cm³-4.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)3,640 cm³3,800 cm³-4.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)20,300 cm⁴19,700 cm⁴+3.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,950 cm³1,950 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)8.15 cm7.95 cm+2.5%
Torsion constant (It)1,270 cm⁴1,510 cm⁴-15.9%

UC 305×305×240 to BS EN 10365:2017; HE 320 M to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 320 M.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 320 M has the larger second moment of area: 68,100 cm⁴ against 64,200 cm⁴, a difference of 5.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, HE 320 M is the more efficient section: 18.1 against 17.7 cm³ per kg/m, 2.3% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.0% weight.

In short, HE 320 M is the stronger section and UC 305×305×240 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

HE 320 M is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 4440 cm³ against 4250 cm³ - 4.3% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

UC 305×305×240 at 240 kg/m, against 245 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 320 M gives 4440 cm³ of plastic modulus and 68,100 cm⁴ of inertia against 4250 cm³ and 64,200 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 320 M, with a second moment of area of 68,100 cm⁴ against 64,200 cm⁴ (5.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 305×305×240 vs W 14X145W 12X170 vs HE 320 M
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…