CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 356×406×551 vs W 14X370

UC 356×406×551 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 14X370 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 12100 cm³ against 12060.9 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.3%. They weigh essentially the same, 551 kg/m and 550.6 kg/m. Both are about 455 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 356×406×551
UC
W 14X370
W
Difference
Mass551 kg/m550.6 kg/m+0.1%
Depth455.6 mm454.7 mm+0.2%
Width418.5 mm419.1 mm-0.1%
Web thickness42.1 mm42.2 mm-0.2%
Flange thickness67.5 mm67.6 mm-0.1%
Area702 cm²703.2 cm²-0.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)227,000 cm⁴226,430 cm⁴+0.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)12,100 cm³12,060.9 cm³+0.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)9,960 cm³9,946.9 cm³+0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)82,700 cm⁴82,830 cm⁴-0.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)6,060 cm³6,063.2 cm³-0.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)10.9 cm10.85 cm+0.5%
Torsion constant (It)9,240 cm⁴9,240 cm⁴same

UC 356×406×551 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 14X370 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 14X370.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UC 356×406×551 has the larger second moment of area: 227,000 cm⁴ against 226,430 cm⁴, a difference of 0.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (22.0 against 21.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 356×406×551 has a plastic modulus of 12100 cm³ and W 14X370 has 12060.9 cm³, a difference of only 0.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UC 356×406×551 is 551 kg/m and W 14X370 is 550.6 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 14X370 gives 12060.9 cm³ of plastic modulus and 226,430 cm⁴ of inertia against 12100 cm³ and 227,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UC 356×406×551, with a second moment of area of 227,000 cm⁴ against 226,430 cm⁴ (0.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…