CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

RHS 50×30×3 - Section Properties

The RHS 50×30×3 is a steel section with a mass of 3.3 kg/m, an overall depth of 50 mm and width of 30 mm and a wall thickness of 3 mm. It has a cross-sectional area of 4.21 cm², a second moment of area Iᵧ of 12.8 cm⁴, a plastic modulus Wₚₗ,ᵧ of 6.57 cm³, tabulated by CivilAxis from EN 10219 · Continental Steel.

Mass
3.3 kg/m
Depth
50 mm
Width
30 mm
Wall thickness
3 mm
Area
4.21 cm²
Ask about capacity, buckling or detailing for RHS 50×30×3.
🔍 Open the full Steel Catalogue
or pick a unit on any row
RHS Cold-formed section profile showing the dimension symbols used for RHS 50×30×3

Dimension symbols for RHS Cold-formed sections. Not to scale.

RHS 50×30×3 section properties to EN 10219 · Continental Steel.

Geometry

Depth of sectionh50
Width of sectionb30
Wall thicknesst3

Mass and area

Mass per metremass3.3
Cross-sectional areaA4.21

Bending about the major axis (y-y)

Area moment of inertia about y-axisIy12.8
Elastic section modulus about y-axisWel,y5.13
Plastic section modulus about y-axisWpl,y6.57
Radius of gyration about y-axisiy1.75

Bending about the minor axis (z-z)

Area moment of inertia about z-axisIz5.7
Elastic section modulus about z-axisWel,z3.8
Plastic section modulus about z-axisWpl,z4.58
Radius of gyration about z-axisiz1.16

Torsion and warping

Torsion constant (St Venant)It13.5
Section modulus for torsionWt6.49

Surface area

Surface area per metreSA/m0.15

Is RHS 50×30×3 strong enough?

Simply supported beam, uniform load, major-axis bending - to EN 1993-1-1.

Passes - 61% utilised, deflection governs
Bending28%
0.7 / 2.3 kNm
Shear5%
2.6 / 53.9 kN
Deflection61%
1.7 / 2.8 mm

Class 1 section. ULS uses γQ = 1.5 on the load you enter; deflection uses the unfactored load against L/360. Lateral-torsional buckling is not included - the compression flange is assumed restrained.

Common questions about RHS 50×30×3

RHS 50×30×3 has a mass of 3.3 kg/m, tabulated to EN 10219. A 12 m length therefore weighs about 40 kg, which is the figure to use for a steel take-off or when checking a lift.

RHS 50×30×3 has a depth of 50 mm, a width of 30 mm, a wall thickness of 3 mm, with a cross-sectional area of 4.21 cm². These are the nominal dimensions from EN 10219; rolling tolerances apply to the delivered section.

The plastic section modulus about the major axis, Wpl,y, is 6.57 cm³, and the elastic modulus Wel,y is 5.13 cm³. Wpl,y is what sets the moment capacity of a Class 1 or 2 section: M_pl,Rd = Wpl,y x f_y / gamma_M0, so at S355 with gamma_M0 = 1.0 this section reaches about 2 kNm before any stability check.

The second moment of area about the major axis, Iy, is 12.8 cm⁴, and about the minor axis Iz is 5.7 cm⁴. Iy is the value deflection depends on - for a simply supported beam under a uniform load, the midspan deflection is 5wL⁴/384EIy - so on spans where a deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

iy is 1.75 cm about the major axis and iz is 1.16 cm about the minor axis. Column buckling is governed by the SMALLER value: the slenderness is lambda = L_cr / i, so with iz = 1.16 cm a 0.1 m effective length already gives lambda = 100. Minor-axis buckling almost always controls unless the weak axis is restrained.

The St Venant torsion constant It is 13.5 cm⁴. Closed sections carry torsion in a shear flow around the perimeter, which makes them far stiffer in torsion than an open section of the same weight and is usually why one is specified.

Related RHS Cold-formed sizes

RHS 50×25×3RHS 50×25×3.2RHS 50×30×2RHS 50×30×2.5RHS 50×30×4RHS 60×40×1.6RHS 60×40×2.3RHS 60×40×2.5

Learn more

📘 How to read a steel section table (UB, UC, IPE, HE)📘 Section modulus explained: elastic (Wel) vs plastic (Wpl)📘 SHS vs RHS vs CHS: choosing a hollow steel section
All RHS Cold-formed sizes
Rectangular Hollow Sections - Cold-formed
Full steel section tables
Every UB, UC, hollow, channel & angle section
Open the interactive tool
Search, compare & run EC3 capacity checks
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…