CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 12X30 vs H-300x150x7.5x12

W 12X30 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-300x150x7.5x12 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 706.28 cm³ against 702 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.6%. W 12X30 is the lighter of the two at 44.6 kg/m against 46.2 kg/m, a saving of 3.5% on steel weight. W 12X30 is deeper, 312.4 mm against 306 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 12X30
W
H-300x150x7.5x12
MB & MC
Difference
Mass44.6 kg/m46.2 kg/m-3.5%
Depth312.4 mm306 mm+2.1%
Width165.6 mm151 mm+9.7%
Web thickness6.6 mm7.5 mm-12.0%
Flange thickness11.2 mm12 mm-6.7%
Area56.7 cm²58.8 cm²-3.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)9,906 cm⁴9,514 cm⁴+4.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)706.28 cm³702 cm³+0.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)632.54 cm³622 cm³+1.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)844.9 cm⁴691 cm⁴+22.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)156.66 cm³142 cm³+10.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.86 cm3.43 cm+12.5%
Torsion constant (It)19.02 cm⁴24.9 cm⁴-23.6%

W 12X30 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-300x150x7.5x12 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-300x150x7.5x12.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 12X30 has the larger second moment of area: 9,906 cm⁴ against 9,514 cm⁴, a difference of 4.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 12X30 is the more efficient section: 15.8 against 15.2 cm³ per kg/m, 4.2% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 12X30 has 156.66 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 142 cm³, 10.3% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.5% weight.

In short, W 12X30 is the stronger section and W 12X30 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 12X30 has a plastic modulus of 706.28 cm³ and H-300x150x7.5x12 has 702 cm³, a difference of only 0.6% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 12X30 at 44.6 kg/m, against 46.2 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.5%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-300x150x7.5x12 gives 702 cm³ of plastic modulus and 9,514 cm⁴ of inertia against 706.28 cm³ and 9,906 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 12X30, with a second moment of area of 9,906 cm⁴ against 9,514 cm⁴ (4.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 305×165×46 vs W 12X30UB 305×165×46 vs H-300x150x7.5x12UB 305×127×48 vs W 12X30UB 305×127×48 vs H-300x150x7.5x12W 12X30 vs IPE A 330W 12X30 vs S 12X31.8
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…