CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 305×165×46 vs W 12X30

UB 305×165×46 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 12X30 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 720 cm³ against 706.28 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.9%. W 12X30 is the lighter of the two at 44.6 kg/m against 46.1 kg/m, a saving of 3.4% on steel weight. Both are about 310 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 305×165×46
UB
W 12X30
W
Difference
Mass46.1 kg/m44.6 kg/m+3.4%
Depth306.6 mm312.4 mm-1.9%
Width165.7 mm165.6 mm+0.1%
Web thickness6.7 mm6.6 mm+1.5%
Flange thickness11.8 mm11.2 mm+5.4%
Area58.7 cm²56.7 cm²+3.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)9,900 cm⁴9,906 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)720 cm³706.28 cm³+1.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)646 cm³632.54 cm³+2.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)896 cm⁴844.9 cm⁴+6.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)166 cm³156.66 cm³+6.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.9 cm3.86 cm+1.0%
Torsion constant (It)22.2 cm⁴19.02 cm⁴+16.7%

UB 305×165×46 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 12X30 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 12X30.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 12X30 has the larger second moment of area: 9,906 cm⁴ against 9,900 cm⁴, a difference of 0.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (15.6 against 15.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.4% weight.

In short, UB 305×165×46 is the stronger section and W 12X30 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 305×165×46 has a plastic modulus of 720 cm³ and W 12X30 has 706.28 cm³, a difference of only 1.9% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 12X30 at 44.6 kg/m, against 46.1 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.4%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 12X30 gives 706.28 cm³ of plastic modulus and 9,906 cm⁴ of inertia against 720 cm³ and 9,900 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 12X30, with a second moment of area of 9,906 cm⁴ against 9,900 cm⁴ (0.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 305×165×46 vs IPE O 300UB 305×165×46 vs S 12X35UB 305×165×46 vs H-300x150x7.5x12UB 305×127×48 vs W 12X30W 12X30 vs IPE A 330W 12X30 vs S 12X31.8W 12X30 vs H-300x150x7.5x12
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…