CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 305×165×46 vs IPE O 300

UB 305×165×46 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); IPE O 300 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. IPE O 300 carries more bending: 744 cm³ of plastic modulus against 720 cm³, 3.2% more. UB 305×165×46 is the lighter of the two at 46.1 kg/m against 49.3 kg/m, a saving of 6.5% on steel weight. Both are about 305 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 305×165×46
UB
IPE O 300
IPE
Difference
Mass46.1 kg/m49.3 kg/m-6.5%
Depth306.6 mm304 mm+0.9%
Width165.7 mm152 mm+9.0%
Web thickness6.7 mm8 mm-16.2%
Flange thickness11.8 mm12.7 mm-7.1%
Area58.7 cm²62.8 cm²-6.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)9,900 cm⁴9,990 cm⁴-0.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)720 cm³744 cm³-3.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)646 cm³658 cm³-1.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)896 cm⁴746 cm⁴+20.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)166 cm³153 cm³+8.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.9 cm3.45 cm+13.0%
Torsion constant (It)22.2 cm⁴31 cm⁴-28.4%

UB 305×165×46 to BS EN 10365:2017; IPE O 300 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE O 300.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, IPE O 300 has the larger second moment of area: 9,990 cm⁴ against 9,900 cm⁴, a difference of 0.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 305×165×46 is the more efficient section: 15.6 against 15.1 cm³ per kg/m, 3.5% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UB 305×165×46 has 166 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 153 cm³, 8.5% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 6.5% weight.

In short, IPE O 300 is the stronger section and UB 305×165×46 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

IPE O 300 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 744 cm³ against 720 cm³ - 3.2% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

UB 305×165×46 at 46.1 kg/m, against 49.3 kg/m for the other - a saving of 6.5%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE O 300 gives 744 cm³ of plastic modulus and 9,990 cm⁴ of inertia against 720 cm³ and 9,900 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

IPE O 300, with a second moment of area of 9,990 cm⁴ against 9,900 cm⁴ (0.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 305×165×46 vs W 12X30UB 305×165×46 vs S 12X35UB 305×165×46 vs H-300x150x7.5x12
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…