CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 12X79 vs HP 12X84

W 12X79 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HP 12X84 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1950.1 cm³ against 1966.4 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.8%. W 12X79 is the lighter of the two at 117.6 kg/m against 125 kg/m, a saving of 5.9% on steel weight. Both are about 314 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 12X79
W
HP 12X84
HP
Difference
Mass117.6 kg/m125 kg/m-5.9%
Depth315 mm312.4 mm+0.8%
Width307.3 mm312.4 mm-1.6%
Web thickness11.9 mm17.4 mm-31.6%
Flange thickness18.7 mm17.4 mm+7.5%
Area149.7 cm²158.7 cm²-5.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)27,555 cm⁴27,055 cm⁴+1.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,950.1 cm³1,966.4 cm³-0.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,753.4 cm³1,737 cm³+0.9%
Second moment, minor (Iz)8,991 cm⁴8,866 cm⁴+1.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)889.82 cm³871.79 cm³+2.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.75 cm7.47 cm+3.7%
Torsion constant (It)159.8 cm⁴176.5 cm⁴-9.5%

W 12X79 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HP 12X84 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to HP 12X84.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 12X79 has the larger second moment of area: 27,555 cm⁴ against 27,055 cm⁴, a difference of 1.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 12X79 is the more efficient section: 16.6 against 15.7 cm³ per kg/m, 5.4% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

In short, HP 12X84 is the stronger section and W 12X79 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 12X79 has a plastic modulus of 1950.1 cm³ and HP 12X84 has 1966.4 cm³, a difference of only 0.8% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 12X79 at 117.6 kg/m, against 125 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.9%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HP 12X84 gives 1966.4 cm³ of plastic modulus and 27,055 cm⁴ of inertia against 1950.1 cm³ and 27,555 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

W 12X79, with a second moment of area of 27,555 cm⁴ against 27,055 cm⁴ (1.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 305×305×118 vs W 12X79UC 305×305×118 vs HP 12X84W 12X79 vs H-300x300x13x20
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…