CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 305×305×118 vs W 12X79

UC 305×305×118 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 12X79 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1960 cm³ against 1950.1 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.5%. They weigh essentially the same, 117.9 kg/m and 117.6 kg/m. Both are about 315 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 305×305×118
UC
W 12X79
W
Difference
Mass117.9 kg/m117.6 kg/m+0.3%
Depth314.5 mm315 mm-0.2%
Width307.4 mm307.3 mmsame
Web thickness12 mm11.9 mm+0.8%
Flange thickness18.7 mm18.7 mmsame
Area150 cm²149.7 cm²+0.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)27,700 cm⁴27,555 cm⁴+0.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,960 cm³1,950.1 cm³+0.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,760 cm³1,753.4 cm³+0.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)9,060 cm⁴8,991 cm⁴+0.8%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)895 cm³889.82 cm³+0.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.77 cm7.75 cm+0.3%
Torsion constant (It)161 cm⁴159.8 cm⁴+0.8%

UC 305×305×118 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 12X79 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 12X79.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UC 305×305×118 has the larger second moment of area: 27,700 cm⁴ against 27,555 cm⁴, a difference of 0.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (16.6 against 16.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 305×305×118 has a plastic modulus of 1960 cm³ and W 12X79 has 1950.1 cm³, a difference of only 0.5% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UC 305×305×118 is 117.9 kg/m and W 12X79 is 117.6 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 12X79 gives 1950.1 cm³ of plastic modulus and 27,555 cm⁴ of inertia against 1960 cm³ and 27,700 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UC 305×305×118, with a second moment of area of 27,700 cm⁴ against 27,555 cm⁴ (0.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 305×305×118 vs HP 12X84UC 305×305×118 vs H-300x300x13x20W 12X79 vs HP 12X84W 12X79 vs H-300x300x13x20
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…