CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 305×305×118 vs H-300x300x13x20

UC 305×305×118 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-300x300x13x20 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. H-300x300x13x20 carries more bending: 2031 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1960 cm³, 3.5% more. UC 305×305×118 is the lighter of the two at 117.9 kg/m against 125 kg/m, a saving of 5.7% on steel weight. Both are about 312 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 305×305×118
UC
H-300x300x13x20
MB & MC
Difference
Mass117.9 kg/m125 kg/m-5.7%
Depth314.5 mm310 mm+1.5%
Width307.4 mm303 mm+1.5%
Web thickness12 mm13 mm-7.7%
Flange thickness18.7 mm20 mm-6.5%
Area150 cm²159 cm²-5.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)27,700 cm⁴28,130 cm⁴-1.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,960 cm³2,031 cm³-3.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,760 cm³1,815 cm³-3.0%
Second moment, minor (Iz)9,060 cm⁴9,282 cm⁴-2.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)895 cm³932 cm³-4.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.77 cm7.64 cm+1.7%
Torsion constant (It)161 cm⁴200 cm⁴-19.5%

UC 305×305×118 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-300x300x13x20 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-300x300x13x20.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-300x300x13x20 has the larger second moment of area: 28,130 cm⁴ against 27,700 cm⁴, a difference of 1.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UC 305×305×118 is the more efficient section: 16.6 against 16.2 cm³ per kg/m, 2.3% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 5.7% weight.

In short, H-300x300x13x20 is the stronger section and UC 305×305×118 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

H-300x300x13x20 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 2031 cm³ against 1960 cm³ - 3.5% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

UC 305×305×118 at 117.9 kg/m, against 125 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.7%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-300x300x13x20 gives 2031 cm³ of plastic modulus and 28,130 cm⁴ of inertia against 1960 cm³ and 27,700 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-300x300x13x20, with a second moment of area of 28,130 cm⁴ against 27,700 cm⁴ (1.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 305×305×118 vs W 12X79UC 305×305×118 vs HP 12X84W 12X79 vs H-300x300x13x20
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…