CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 12X96 vs HP 14X89

W 12X96 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HP 14X89 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2408.9 cm³ against 2392.5 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.7%. HP 14X89 is the lighter of the two at 132.4 kg/m against 142.9 kg/m, a saving of 7.9% on steel weight. HP 14X89 is deeper, 350.5 mm against 322.6 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 12X96
W
HP 14X89
HP
Difference
Mass142.9 kg/m132.4 kg/m+7.9%
Depth322.6 mm350.5 mm-8.0%
Width309.9 mm373.4 mm-17.0%
Web thickness14 mm15.6 mm-10.3%
Flange thickness22.9 mm15.6 mm+46.8%
Area181.9 cm²168.4 cm²+8.0%
Second moment, major (Iy)34,672 cm⁴37,627 cm⁴-7.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,408.9 cm³2,392.5 cm³+0.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,146.7 cm³2,146.7 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)11,238 cm⁴13,569 cm⁴-17.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,106.1 cm³1,109.4 cm³-0.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.85 cm8.97 cm-12.5%
Torsion constant (It)285.1 cm⁴149.4 cm⁴+90.8%

W 12X96 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HP 14X89 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to HP 14X89.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HP 14X89 has the larger second moment of area: 37,627 cm⁴ against 34,672 cm⁴, a difference of 7.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, HP 14X89 is the more efficient section: 18.1 against 16.9 cm³ per kg/m, 6.7% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

In short, W 12X96 is the stronger section and HP 14X89 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 12X96 has a plastic modulus of 2408.9 cm³ and HP 14X89 has 2392.5 cm³, a difference of only 0.7% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

HP 14X89 at 132.4 kg/m, against 142.9 kg/m for the other - a saving of 7.9%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HP 14X89 gives 2392.5 cm³ of plastic modulus and 37,627 cm⁴ of inertia against 2408.9 cm³ and 34,672 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

HP 14X89, with a second moment of area of 37,627 cm⁴ against 34,672 cm⁴ (7.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 356×368×129 vs HP 14X89UC 305×305×137 vs W 12X96W 12X96 vs HE 340 BHE 340 B vs HP 14X89
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…