CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 12X96 vs HE 340 B

W 12X96 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 340 B is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2408.9 cm³ against 2410 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. HE 340 B is the lighter of the two at 134 kg/m against 142.9 kg/m, a saving of 6.6% on steel weight. HE 340 B is deeper, 340 mm against 322.6 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 12X96
W
HE 340 B
HE
Difference
Mass142.9 kg/m134 kg/m+6.6%
Depth322.6 mm340 mm-5.1%
Width309.9 mm300 mm+3.3%
Web thickness14 mm12 mm+16.7%
Flange thickness22.9 mm21.5 mm+6.5%
Area181.9 cm²171 cm²+6.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)34,672 cm⁴36,700 cm⁴-5.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,408.9 cm³2,410 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,146.7 cm³2,160 cm³-0.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)11,238 cm⁴9,690 cm⁴+16.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,106.1 cm³986 cm³+12.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.85 cm7.53 cm+4.2%
Torsion constant (It)285.1 cm⁴263 cm⁴+8.4%

W 12X96 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 340 B to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 340 B.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 340 B has the larger second moment of area: 36,700 cm⁴ against 34,672 cm⁴, a difference of 5.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, HE 340 B is the more efficient section: 18.0 against 16.9 cm³ per kg/m, 6.3% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 12X96 has 1106.1 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 986 cm³, 12.2% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 6.6% weight.

In short, HE 340 B is the stronger section and HE 340 B is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 12X96 has a plastic modulus of 2408.9 cm³ and HE 340 B has 2410 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

HE 340 B at 134 kg/m, against 142.9 kg/m for the other - a saving of 6.6%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 340 B gives 2410 cm³ of plastic modulus and 36,700 cm⁴ of inertia against 2408.9 cm³ and 34,672 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 340 B, with a second moment of area of 36,700 cm⁴ against 34,672 cm⁴ (5.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 356×368×129 vs HE 340 BUC 305×305×137 vs W 12X96W 12X96 vs HP 14X89HE 340 B vs HP 14X89
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…