CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 356×368×129 vs HE 340 B

UC 356×368×129 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); HE 340 B is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. UC 356×368×129 carries more bending: 2480 cm³ of plastic modulus against 2410 cm³, 2.9% more. UC 356×368×129 is the lighter of the two at 129 kg/m against 134 kg/m, a saving of 3.7% on steel weight. UC 356×368×129 is deeper, 355.6 mm against 340 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 356×368×129
UC
HE 340 B
HE
Difference
Mass129 kg/m134 kg/m-3.7%
Depth355.6 mm340 mm+4.6%
Width368.6 mm300 mm+22.9%
Web thickness10.4 mm12 mm-13.3%
Flange thickness17.5 mm21.5 mm-18.6%
Area164 cm²171 cm²-4.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)40,200 cm⁴36,700 cm⁴+9.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,480 cm³2,410 cm³+2.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,260 cm³2,160 cm³+4.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)14,600 cm⁴9,690 cm⁴+50.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,200 cm³986 cm³+21.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.43 cm7.53 cm+25.2%
Torsion constant (It)153 cm⁴263 cm⁴-41.8%

UC 356×368×129 to BS EN 10365:2017; HE 340 B to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 340 B.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UC 356×368×129 has the larger second moment of area: 40,200 cm⁴ against 36,700 cm⁴, a difference of 9.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UC 356×368×129 is the more efficient section: 19.2 against 18.0 cm³ per kg/m, 6.9% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UC 356×368×129 has 1200 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 986 cm³, 21.7% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.7% weight.

In short, UC 356×368×129 is the stronger section and UC 356×368×129 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

UC 356×368×129 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 2480 cm³ against 2410 cm³ - 2.9% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

UC 356×368×129 at 129 kg/m, against 134 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.7%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 340 B gives 2410 cm³ of plastic modulus and 36,700 cm⁴ of inertia against 2480 cm³ and 40,200 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UC 356×368×129, with a second moment of area of 40,200 cm⁴ against 36,700 cm⁴ (9.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 356×368×129 vs W 14X90UC 356×368×129 vs HP 14X89UC 356×368×129 vs H-350x350x12x19-135W 12X96 vs HE 340 BHE 340 B vs HP 14X89
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…