CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

HE 340 B vs HP 14X89

HE 340 B is an HE section from the European (Continental) range; HP 14X89 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2410 cm³ against 2392.5 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.7%. They weigh essentially the same, 134 kg/m and 132.4 kg/m. HP 14X89 is deeper, 350.5 mm against 340 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyHE 340 B
HE
HP 14X89
HP
Difference
Mass134 kg/m132.4 kg/m+1.2%
Depth340 mm350.5 mm-3.0%
Width300 mm373.4 mm-19.7%
Web thickness12 mm15.6 mm-23.1%
Flange thickness21.5 mm15.6 mm+37.8%
Area171 cm²168.4 cm²+1.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)36,700 cm⁴37,627 cm⁴-2.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,410 cm³2,392.5 cm³+0.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,160 cm³2,146.7 cm³+0.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)9,690 cm⁴13,569 cm⁴-28.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)986 cm³1,109.4 cm³-11.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.53 cm8.97 cm-16.1%
Torsion constant (It)263 cm⁴149.4 cm⁴+76.0%

HE 340 B to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; HP 14X89 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to HP 14X89.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HP 14X89 has the larger second moment of area: 37,627 cm⁴ against 36,700 cm⁴, a difference of 2.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (18.0 against 18.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: HP 14X89 has 1109.4 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 986 cm³, 11.1% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. HE sections are specified to EN 10365 · Continental Steel and HP to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. HE 340 B has a plastic modulus of 2410 cm³ and HP 14X89 has 2392.5 cm³, a difference of only 0.7% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: HE 340 B is 134 kg/m and HP 14X89 is 132.4 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HP 14X89 gives 2392.5 cm³ of plastic modulus and 37,627 cm⁴ of inertia against 2410 cm³ and 36,700 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (EN 10365 · Continental Steel and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HP 14X89, with a second moment of area of 37,627 cm⁴ against 36,700 cm⁴ (2.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 356×368×129 vs HE 340 BUC 356×368×129 vs HP 14X89W 12X96 vs HE 340 BW 12X96 vs HP 14X89
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…