CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 14X34 vs H-350x175x7x11-49.6

W 14X34 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-350x175x7x11-49.6 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. W 14X34 carries more bending: 894.73 cm³ of plastic modulus against 868 cm³, 3.1% more. H-350x175x7x11-49.6 is the lighter of the two at 49.6 kg/m against 50.6 kg/m, a saving of 2.0% on steel weight. Both are about 353 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 14X34
W
H-350x175x7x11-49.6
MB & MC
Difference
Mass50.6 kg/m49.6 kg/m+2.0%
Depth355.6 mm350 mm+1.6%
Width171.5 mm175 mm-2.0%
Web thickness7.2 mm7 mm+2.9%
Flange thickness11.6 mm11 mm+5.5%
Area64.5 cm²63.1 cm²+2.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)14,152 cm⁴13,560 cm⁴+4.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)894.73 cm³868 cm³+3.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)796.41 cm³775 cm³+2.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)969.8 cm⁴985 cm⁴-1.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)173.7 cm³174 cm³-0.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.89 cm3.95 cm-1.5%
Torsion constant (It)23.68 cm⁴23 cm⁴+3.0%

W 14X34 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-350x175x7x11-49.6 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-350x175x7x11-49.6.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 14X34 has the larger second moment of area: 14,152 cm⁴ against 13,560 cm⁴, a difference of 4.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (17.7 against 17.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.0% weight.

In short, W 14X34 is the stronger section and H-350x175x7x11-49.6 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 14X34 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 894.73 cm³ against 868 cm³ - 3.1% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

H-350x175x7x11-49.6 at 49.6 kg/m, against 50.6 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-350x175x7x11-49.6 gives 868 cm³ of plastic modulus and 13,560 cm⁴ of inertia against 894.73 cm³ and 14,152 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 14X34, with a second moment of area of 14,152 cm⁴ against 13,560 cm⁴ (4.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 356×171×51 vs W 14X34UB 356×171×51 vs H-350x175x7x11-49.6W 14X34 vs IPE A 360
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…