CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 356×171×51 vs H-350x175x7x11-49.6

UB 356×171×51 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-350x175x7x11-49.6 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. UB 356×171×51 carries more bending: 896 cm³ of plastic modulus against 868 cm³, 3.2% more. H-350x175x7x11-49.6 is the lighter of the two at 49.6 kg/m against 51 kg/m, a saving of 2.8% on steel weight. Both are about 353 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 356×171×51
UB
H-350x175x7x11-49.6
MB & MC
Difference
Mass51 kg/m49.6 kg/m+2.8%
Depth355 mm350 mm+1.4%
Width171.5 mm175 mm-2.0%
Web thickness7.4 mm7 mm+5.7%
Flange thickness11.5 mm11 mm+4.5%
Area64.9 cm²63.1 cm²+2.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)14,100 cm⁴13,560 cm⁴+4.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)896 cm³868 cm³+3.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)796 cm³775 cm³+2.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)968 cm⁴985 cm⁴-1.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)174 cm³174 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.86 cm3.95 cm-2.3%
Torsion constant (It)23.8 cm⁴23 cm⁴+3.5%

UB 356×171×51 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-350x175x7x11-49.6 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-350x175x7x11-49.6.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 356×171×51 has the larger second moment of area: 14,100 cm⁴ against 13,560 cm⁴, a difference of 4.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (17.6 against 17.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.8% weight.

In short, UB 356×171×51 is the stronger section and H-350x175x7x11-49.6 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

UB 356×171×51 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 896 cm³ against 868 cm³ - 3.2% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

H-350x175x7x11-49.6 at 49.6 kg/m, against 51 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.8%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-350x175x7x11-49.6 gives 868 cm³ of plastic modulus and 13,560 cm⁴ of inertia against 896 cm³ and 14,100 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 356×171×51, with a second moment of area of 14,100 cm⁴ against 13,560 cm⁴ (4.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 356×171×51 vs IPE A 360UB 356×171×51 vs W 14X34W 14X34 vs H-350x175x7x11-49.6
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…