CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 356×171×51 vs W 14X34

UB 356×171×51 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 14X34 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 896 cm³ against 894.73 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 51 kg/m and 50.6 kg/m. Both are about 355 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 356×171×51
UB
W 14X34
W
Difference
Mass51 kg/m50.6 kg/m+0.8%
Depth355 mm355.6 mm-0.2%
Width171.5 mm171.5 mmsame
Web thickness7.4 mm7.2 mm+2.8%
Flange thickness11.5 mm11.6 mm-0.9%
Area64.9 cm²64.5 cm²+0.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)14,100 cm⁴14,152 cm⁴-0.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)896 cm³894.73 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)796 cm³796.41 cm³-0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)968 cm⁴969.8 cm⁴-0.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)174 cm³173.7 cm³+0.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.86 cm3.89 cm-0.8%
Torsion constant (It)23.8 cm⁴23.68 cm⁴+0.5%

UB 356×171×51 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 14X34 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 14X34.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 14X34 has the larger second moment of area: 14,152 cm⁴ against 14,100 cm⁴, a difference of 0.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (17.6 against 17.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 356×171×51 has a plastic modulus of 896 cm³ and W 14X34 has 894.73 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 356×171×51 is 51 kg/m and W 14X34 is 50.6 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 14X34 gives 894.73 cm³ of plastic modulus and 14,152 cm⁴ of inertia against 896 cm³ and 14,100 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 14X34, with a second moment of area of 14,152 cm⁴ against 14,100 cm⁴ (0.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 356×171×51 vs IPE A 360UB 356×171×51 vs H-350x175x7x11-49.6W 14X34 vs IPE A 360W 14X34 vs H-350x175x7x11-49.6
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…