CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 14X38 vs H-350x175x8x13

W 14X38 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-350x175x8x13 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1007.8 cm³ against 1022 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.4%. W 14X38 is the lighter of the two at 56.6 kg/m against 57.8 kg/m, a saving of 2.1% on steel weight. Both are about 356 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 14X38
W
H-350x175x8x13
MB & MC
Difference
Mass56.6 kg/m57.8 kg/m-2.1%
Depth358.1 mm354 mm+1.2%
Width172 mm176 mm-2.3%
Web thickness7.9 mm8 mm-1.2%
Flange thickness13.1 mm13 mm+0.8%
Area72.3 cm²73.7 cm²-1.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)16,025 cm⁴16,100 cm⁴-0.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,007.8 cm³1,022 cm³-1.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)894.73 cm³909 cm³-1.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,111 cm⁴1,184 cm⁴-6.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)198.28 cm³208 cm³-4.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.94 cm4.01 cm-1.7%
Torsion constant (It)33.22 cm⁴36.1 cm⁴-8.0%

W 14X38 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-350x175x8x13 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-350x175x8x13.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-350x175x8x13 has the larger second moment of area: 16,100 cm⁴ against 16,025 cm⁴, a difference of 0.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (17.8 against 17.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.1% weight.

In short, H-350x175x8x13 is the stronger section and W 14X38 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 14X38 has a plastic modulus of 1007.8 cm³ and H-350x175x8x13 has 1022 cm³, a difference of only 1.4% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 14X38 at 56.6 kg/m, against 57.8 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.1%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-350x175x8x13 gives 1022 cm³ of plastic modulus and 16,100 cm⁴ of inertia against 1007.8 cm³ and 16,025 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-350x175x8x13, with a second moment of area of 16,100 cm⁴ against 16,025 cm⁴ (0.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 360 vs W 14X38IPE 360 vs H-350x175x8x13UB 356×171×57 vs W 14X38UB 356×171×57 vs H-350x175x8x13
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…