CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

IPE 360 vs H-350x175x8x13

IPE 360 is an IPE section from the European (Continental) range; H-350x175x8x13 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1020 cm³ against 1022 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. They weigh essentially the same, 57.1 kg/m and 57.8 kg/m. Both are about 357 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyIPE 360
IPE
H-350x175x8x13
MB & MC
Difference
Mass57.1 kg/m57.8 kg/m-1.2%
Depth360 mm354 mm+1.7%
Width170 mm176 mm-3.4%
Web thickness8 mm8 mmsame
Flange thickness12.7 mm13 mm-2.3%
Area72.7 cm²73.7 cm²-1.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)16,300 cm⁴16,100 cm⁴+1.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,020 cm³1,022 cm³-0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)904 cm³909 cm³-0.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,040 cm⁴1,184 cm⁴-12.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)191 cm³208 cm³-8.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.79 cm4.01 cm-5.5%
Torsion constant (It)37.4 cm⁴36.1 cm⁴+3.6%

IPE 360 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; H-350x175x8x13 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-350x175x8x13.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, IPE 360 has the larger second moment of area: 16,300 cm⁴ against 16,100 cm⁴, a difference of 1.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (17.9 against 17.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-350x175x8x13 has 208 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 191 cm³, 8.2% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. IPE 360 has a plastic modulus of 1020 cm³ and H-350x175x8x13 has 1022 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: IPE 360 is 57.1 kg/m and H-350x175x8x13 is 57.8 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-350x175x8x13 gives 1022 cm³ of plastic modulus and 16,100 cm⁴ of inertia against 1020 cm³ and 16,300 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

IPE 360, with a second moment of area of 16,300 cm⁴ against 16,100 cm⁴ (1.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 360 vs UB 356×171×57IPE 360 vs W 14X38UB 356×171×57 vs H-350x175x8x13W 14X38 vs H-350x175x8x13
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…