CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

IPE 360 vs UB 356×171×57

IPE 360 is an IPE section from the European (Continental) range; UB 356×171×57 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1020 cm³ against 1010 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 57.1 kg/m and 57 kg/m. Both are about 359 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyIPE 360
IPE
UB 356×171×57
UB
Difference
Mass57.1 kg/m57 kg/m+0.2%
Depth360 mm358 mm+0.6%
Width170 mm172.2 mm-1.3%
Web thickness8 mm8.1 mm-1.2%
Flange thickness12.7 mm13 mm-2.3%
Area72.7 cm²72.6 cm²+0.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)16,300 cm⁴16,000 cm⁴+1.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,020 cm³1,010 cm³+1.0%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)904 cm³896 cm³+0.9%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,040 cm⁴1,110 cm⁴-6.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)191 cm³199 cm³-4.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.79 cm3.91 cm-3.1%
Torsion constant (It)37.4 cm⁴33.4 cm⁴+12.0%

IPE 360 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; UB 356×171×57 to BS EN 10365:2017. Difference is expressed relative to UB 356×171×57.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, IPE 360 has the larger second moment of area: 16,300 cm⁴ against 16,000 cm⁴, a difference of 1.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (17.9 against 17.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. IPE sections are specified to EN 10365 · Continental Steel and UB to BS EN 10365:2017; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. IPE 360 has a plastic modulus of 1020 cm³ and UB 356×171×57 has 1010 cm³, a difference of only 1.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: IPE 360 is 57.1 kg/m and UB 356×171×57 is 57 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: UB 356×171×57 gives 1010 cm³ of plastic modulus and 16,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 1020 cm³ and 16,300 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (EN 10365 · Continental Steel and BS EN 10365:2017), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

IPE 360, with a second moment of area of 16,300 cm⁴ against 16,000 cm⁴ (1.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 360 vs W 14X38IPE 360 vs H-350x175x8x13UB 356×171×57 vs W 14X38UB 356×171×57 vs H-350x175x8x13
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…