CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 356×171×57 vs W 14X38

UB 356×171×57 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 14X38 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1010 cm³ against 1007.8 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. They weigh essentially the same, 57 kg/m and 56.6 kg/m. Both are about 358 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 356×171×57
UB
W 14X38
W
Difference
Mass57 kg/m56.6 kg/m+0.7%
Depth358 mm358.1 mmsame
Width172.2 mm172 mm+0.1%
Web thickness8.1 mm7.9 mm+2.5%
Flange thickness13 mm13.1 mm-0.8%
Area72.6 cm²72.3 cm²+0.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)16,000 cm⁴16,025 cm⁴-0.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,010 cm³1,007.8 cm³+0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)896 cm³894.73 cm³+0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,110 cm⁴1,111 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)199 cm³198.28 cm³+0.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.91 cm3.94 cm-0.8%
Torsion constant (It)33.4 cm⁴33.22 cm⁴+0.5%

UB 356×171×57 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 14X38 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 14X38.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 14X38 has the larger second moment of area: 16,025 cm⁴ against 16,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (17.7 against 17.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 356×171×57 has a plastic modulus of 1010 cm³ and W 14X38 has 1007.8 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 356×171×57 is 57 kg/m and W 14X38 is 56.6 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 14X38 gives 1007.8 cm³ of plastic modulus and 16,025 cm⁴ of inertia against 1010 cm³ and 16,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 14X38, with a second moment of area of 16,025 cm⁴ against 16,000 cm⁴ (0.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 360 vs UB 356×171×57IPE 360 vs W 14X38UB 356×171×57 vs H-350x175x8x13W 14X38 vs H-350x175x8x13
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…