CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 14X99 vs HP 14X102

W 14X99 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HP 14X102 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. W 14X99 carries more bending: 2835 cm³ of plastic modulus against 2769.4 cm³, 2.4% more. W 14X99 is the lighter of the two at 147.3 kg/m against 151.8 kg/m, a saving of 3.0% on steel weight. Both are about 358 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 14X99
W
HP 14X102
HP
Difference
Mass147.3 kg/m151.8 kg/m-3.0%
Depth360.7 mm355.6 mm+1.4%
Width370.8 mm375.9 mm-1.4%
Web thickness12.3 mm17.9 mm-31.3%
Flange thickness19.8 mm17.9 mm+10.6%
Area187.7 cm²194.2 cm²-3.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)46,202 cm⁴43,704 cm⁴+5.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,835 cm³2,769.4 cm³+2.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,572.8 cm³2,458.1 cm³+4.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)16,733 cm⁴15,817 cm⁴+5.8%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,370 cm³1,291.3 cm³+6.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.42 cm9.04 cm+4.2%
Torsion constant (It)223.5 cm⁴224.3 cm⁴-0.4%

W 14X99 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HP 14X102 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to HP 14X102.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 14X99 has the larger second moment of area: 46,202 cm⁴ against 43,704 cm⁴, a difference of 5.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 14X99 is the more efficient section: 19.2 against 18.2 cm³ per kg/m, 5.5% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

In short, W 14X99 is the stronger section and W 14X99 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 14X99 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 2835 cm³ against 2769.4 cm³ - 2.4% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

W 14X99 at 147.3 kg/m, against 151.8 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HP 14X102 gives 2769.4 cm³ of plastic modulus and 43,704 cm⁴ of inertia against 2835 cm³ and 46,202 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

W 14X99, with a second moment of area of 46,202 cm⁴ against 43,704 cm⁴ (5.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 356×368×153 vs W 14X99W 14X99 vs HE 360 BW 14X99 vs H-400x400x15x15HE 360 B vs HP 14X102
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…