CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 14X99 vs H-400x400x15x15

W 14X99 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-400x400x15x15 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2835 cm³ against 2802 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.2%. H-400x400x15x15 is the lighter of the two at 140 kg/m against 147.3 kg/m, a saving of 5.2% on steel weight. H-400x400x15x15 is deeper, 388 mm against 360.7 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 14X99
W
H-400x400x15x15
MB & MC
Difference
Mass147.3 kg/m140 kg/m+5.2%
Depth360.7 mm388 mm-7.0%
Width370.8 mm402 mm-7.8%
Web thickness12.3 mm15 mm-18.0%
Flange thickness19.8 mm15 mm+32.0%
Area187.7 cm²178 cm²+5.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)46,202 cm⁴48,970 cm⁴-5.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,835 cm³2,802 cm³+1.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,572.8 cm³2,524 cm³+1.9%
Second moment, minor (Iz)16,733 cm⁴16,260 cm⁴+2.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,370 cm³1,237 cm³+10.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.42 cm9.55 cm-1.4%
Torsion constant (It)223.5 cm⁴156 cm⁴+43.3%

W 14X99 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-400x400x15x15 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-400x400x15x15.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-400x400x15x15 has the larger second moment of area: 48,970 cm⁴ against 46,202 cm⁴, a difference of 5.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-400x400x15x15 is the more efficient section: 20.0 against 19.2 cm³ per kg/m, 3.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 14X99 has 1370 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 1237 cm³, 10.8% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 5.2% weight.

In short, W 14X99 is the stronger section and H-400x400x15x15 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 14X99 has a plastic modulus of 2835 cm³ and H-400x400x15x15 has 2802 cm³, a difference of only 1.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

H-400x400x15x15 at 140 kg/m, against 147.3 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.2%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-400x400x15x15 gives 2802 cm³ of plastic modulus and 48,970 cm⁴ of inertia against 2835 cm³ and 46,202 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-400x400x15x15, with a second moment of area of 48,970 cm⁴ against 46,202 cm⁴ (5.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 356×368×153 vs W 14X99W 14X99 vs HE 360 BW 14X99 vs HP 14X102
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…