CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 14X99 vs HE 360 B

W 14X99 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 360 B is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. W 14X99 carries more bending: 2835 cm³ of plastic modulus against 2680 cm³, 5.8% more. HE 360 B is the lighter of the two at 142 kg/m against 147.3 kg/m, a saving of 3.7% on steel weight. Both are about 360 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 14X99
W
HE 360 B
HE
Difference
Mass147.3 kg/m142 kg/m+3.7%
Depth360.7 mm360 mm+0.2%
Width370.8 mm300 mm+23.6%
Web thickness12.3 mm12.5 mm-1.6%
Flange thickness19.8 mm22.5 mm-12.0%
Area187.7 cm²181 cm²+3.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)46,202 cm⁴43,200 cm⁴+6.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,835 cm³2,680 cm³+5.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,572.8 cm³2,400 cm³+7.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)16,733 cm⁴10,100 cm⁴+65.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,370 cm³1,030 cm³+33.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.42 cm7.49 cm+25.8%
Torsion constant (It)223.5 cm⁴298 cm⁴-25.0%

W 14X99 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 360 B to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 360 B.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 14X99 has the larger second moment of area: 46,202 cm⁴ against 43,200 cm⁴, a difference of 6.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (19.2 against 18.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 14X99 has 1370 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 1030 cm³, 33.0% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.7% weight.

In short, W 14X99 is the stronger section and HE 360 B is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 14X99 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 2835 cm³ against 2680 cm³ - 5.8% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

HE 360 B at 142 kg/m, against 147.3 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.7%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 360 B gives 2680 cm³ of plastic modulus and 43,200 cm⁴ of inertia against 2835 cm³ and 46,202 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 14X99, with a second moment of area of 46,202 cm⁴ against 43,200 cm⁴ (6.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 356×368×153 vs W 14X99UC 305×305×158 vs HE 360 BW 14X99 vs HP 14X102W 14X99 vs H-400x400x15x15W 14X90 vs HE 360 BW 12X106 vs HE 360 BHE 360 B vs HP 14X102
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…