CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 18X71 vs H-450x200x14x19

W 18X71 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-450x200x14x19 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2392.5 cm³ against 2399 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.3%. W 18X71 is the lighter of the two at 105.7 kg/m against 110 kg/m, a saving of 3.9% on steel weight. W 18X71 is deeper, 469.9 mm against 460 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 18X71
W
H-450x200x14x19
MB & MC
Difference
Mass105.7 kg/m110 kg/m-3.9%
Depth469.9 mm460 mm+2.2%
Width194.1 mm205 mm-5.3%
Web thickness12.6 mm14 mm-10.0%
Flange thickness20.6 mm19 mm+8.4%
Area134.8 cm²140 cm²-3.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)48,699 cm⁴47,860 cm⁴+1.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,392.5 cm³2,399 cm³-0.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,081.2 cm³2,081 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,510 cm⁴2,742 cm⁴-8.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)404.76 cm³423 cm³-4.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.32 cm4.43 cm-2.5%
Torsion constant (It)145.3 cm⁴152 cm⁴-4.4%

W 18X71 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-450x200x14x19 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-450x200x14x19.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 18X71 has the larger second moment of area: 48,699 cm⁴ against 47,860 cm⁴, a difference of 1.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 18X71 is the more efficient section: 22.6 against 21.8 cm³ per kg/m, 3.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.9% weight.

In short, H-450x200x14x19 is the stronger section and W 18X71 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 18X71 has a plastic modulus of 2392.5 cm³ and H-450x200x14x19 has 2399 cm³, a difference of only 0.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 18X71 at 105.7 kg/m, against 110 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.9%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-450x200x14x19 gives 2399 cm³ of plastic modulus and 47,860 cm⁴ of inertia against 2392.5 cm³ and 48,699 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 18X71, with a second moment of area of 48,699 cm⁴ against 47,860 cm⁴ (1.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 457×191×106 vs W 18X71UB 457×191×106 vs H-450x200x14x19W 18X71 vs IPE V 450
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…