CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 457×191×106 vs W 18X71

UB 457×191×106 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 18X71 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2390 cm³ against 2392.5 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 105.8 kg/m and 105.7 kg/m. Both are about 470 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 457×191×106
UB
W 18X71
W
Difference
Mass105.8 kg/m105.7 kg/m+0.1%
Depth469.2 mm469.9 mm-0.1%
Width194 mm194.1 mm-0.1%
Web thickness12.6 mm12.6 mmsame
Flange thickness20.6 mm20.6 mmsame
Area135 cm²134.8 cm²+0.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)48,900 cm⁴48,699 cm⁴+0.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,390 cm³2,392.5 cm³-0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,080 cm³2,081.2 cm³-0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,510 cm⁴2,510 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)405 cm³404.76 cm³+0.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.32 cm4.32 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)146 cm⁴145.3 cm⁴+0.5%

UB 457×191×106 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 18X71 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 18X71.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 457×191×106 has the larger second moment of area: 48,900 cm⁴ against 48,699 cm⁴, a difference of 0.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (22.6 against 22.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 457×191×106 has a plastic modulus of 2390 cm³ and W 18X71 has 2392.5 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 457×191×106 is 105.8 kg/m and W 18X71 is 105.7 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 18X71 gives 2392.5 cm³ of plastic modulus and 48,699 cm⁴ of inertia against 2390 cm³ and 48,900 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 457×191×106, with a second moment of area of 48,900 cm⁴ against 48,699 cm⁴ (0.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 457×191×106 vs IPE V 450UB 457×191×106 vs H-450x200x14x19W 18X71 vs IPE V 450W 18X71 vs H-450x200x14x19
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…