CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 457×191×106 vs H-450x200x14x19

UB 457×191×106 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-450x200x14x19 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2390 cm³ against 2399 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.4%. UB 457×191×106 is the lighter of the two at 105.8 kg/m against 110 kg/m, a saving of 3.8% on steel weight. Both are about 465 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 457×191×106
UB
H-450x200x14x19
MB & MC
Difference
Mass105.8 kg/m110 kg/m-3.8%
Depth469.2 mm460 mm+2.0%
Width194 mm205 mm-5.4%
Web thickness12.6 mm14 mm-10.0%
Flange thickness20.6 mm19 mm+8.4%
Area135 cm²140 cm²-3.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)48,900 cm⁴47,860 cm⁴+2.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,390 cm³2,399 cm³-0.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,080 cm³2,081 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,510 cm⁴2,742 cm⁴-8.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)405 cm³423 cm³-4.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.32 cm4.43 cm-2.5%
Torsion constant (It)146 cm⁴152 cm⁴-3.9%

UB 457×191×106 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-450x200x14x19 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-450x200x14x19.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 457×191×106 has the larger second moment of area: 48,900 cm⁴ against 47,860 cm⁴, a difference of 2.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 457×191×106 is the more efficient section: 22.6 against 21.8 cm³ per kg/m, 3.6% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.8% weight.

In short, H-450x200x14x19 is the stronger section and UB 457×191×106 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 457×191×106 has a plastic modulus of 2390 cm³ and H-450x200x14x19 has 2399 cm³, a difference of only 0.4% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

UB 457×191×106 at 105.8 kg/m, against 110 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.8%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-450x200x14x19 gives 2399 cm³ of plastic modulus and 47,860 cm⁴ of inertia against 2390 cm³ and 48,900 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 457×191×106, with a second moment of area of 48,900 cm⁴ against 47,860 cm⁴ (2.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 457×191×106 vs IPE V 450UB 457×191×106 vs W 18X71W 18X71 vs H-450x200x14x19
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…