CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 21X83 vs IPE O 550

W 21X83 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; IPE O 550 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 3211.9 cm³ against 3260 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.5%. They weigh essentially the same, 123.5 kg/m and 123 kg/m. IPE O 550 is deeper, 556 mm against 543.6 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 21X83
W
IPE O 550
IPE
Difference
Mass123.5 kg/m123 kg/m+0.4%
Depth543.6 mm556 mm-2.2%
Width212.3 mm212 mm+0.1%
Web thickness13.1 mm12.7 mm+3.1%
Flange thickness21.2 mm20.2 mm+5.0%
Area157.4 cm²156 cm²+0.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)76,170 cm⁴79,200 cm⁴-3.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,211.9 cm³3,260 cm³-1.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,802.2 cm³2,850 cm³-1.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)3,388 cm⁴3,220 cm⁴+5.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)499.81 cm³481 cm³+3.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.65 cm4.55 cm+2.2%
Torsion constant (It)180.6 cm⁴187 cm⁴-3.4%

W 21X83 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; IPE O 550 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE O 550.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, IPE O 550 has the larger second moment of area: 79,200 cm⁴ against 76,170 cm⁴, a difference of 3.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (26.0 against 26.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 21X83 has a plastic modulus of 3211.9 cm³ and IPE O 550 has 3260 cm³, a difference of only 1.5% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 21X83 is 123.5 kg/m and IPE O 550 is 123 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE O 550 gives 3260 cm³ of plastic modulus and 79,200 cm⁴ of inertia against 3211.9 cm³ and 76,170 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

IPE O 550, with a second moment of area of 79,200 cm⁴ against 76,170 cm⁴ (3.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 533×210×122 vs IPE O 550UB 533×210×122 vs W 21X83W 21X83 vs HE 550 AAW 21X83 vs S 20X96
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…