CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 533×210×122 vs IPE O 550

UB 533×210×122 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); IPE O 550 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 3200 cm³ against 3260 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.8%. They weigh essentially the same, 122 kg/m and 123 kg/m. IPE O 550 is deeper, 556 mm against 544.5 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 533×210×122
UB
IPE O 550
IPE
Difference
Mass122 kg/m123 kg/m-0.8%
Depth544.5 mm556 mm-2.1%
Width211.9 mm212 mmsame
Web thickness12.7 mm12.7 mmsame
Flange thickness21.3 mm20.2 mm+5.4%
Area155 cm²156 cm²-0.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)76,000 cm⁴79,200 cm⁴-4.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,200 cm³3,260 cm³-1.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,790 cm³2,850 cm³-2.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)3,390 cm⁴3,220 cm⁴+5.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)500 cm³481 cm³+4.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.67 cm4.55 cm+2.6%
Torsion constant (It)178 cm⁴187 cm⁴-4.8%

UB 533×210×122 to BS EN 10365:2017; IPE O 550 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE O 550.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, IPE O 550 has the larger second moment of area: 79,200 cm⁴ against 76,000 cm⁴, a difference of 4.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (26.2 against 26.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 533×210×122 has a plastic modulus of 3200 cm³ and IPE O 550 has 3260 cm³, a difference of only 1.8% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 533×210×122 is 122 kg/m and IPE O 550 is 123 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE O 550 gives 3260 cm³ of plastic modulus and 79,200 cm⁴ of inertia against 3200 cm³ and 76,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

IPE O 550, with a second moment of area of 79,200 cm⁴ against 76,000 cm⁴ (4.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 533×210×122 vs HE 550 AAUB 533×210×122 vs W 21X83UB 533×210×122 vs S 20X96W 21X83 vs IPE O 550
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…