CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 533×210×122 vs W 21X83

UB 533×210×122 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 21X83 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 3200 cm³ against 3211.9 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.4%. They weigh essentially the same, 122 kg/m and 123.5 kg/m. Both are about 544 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 533×210×122
UB
W 21X83
W
Difference
Mass122 kg/m123.5 kg/m-1.2%
Depth544.5 mm543.6 mm+0.2%
Width211.9 mm212.3 mm-0.2%
Web thickness12.7 mm13.1 mm-3.1%
Flange thickness21.3 mm21.2 mm+0.5%
Area155 cm²157.4 cm²-1.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)76,000 cm⁴76,170 cm⁴-0.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,200 cm³3,211.9 cm³-0.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,790 cm³2,802.2 cm³-0.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)3,390 cm⁴3,388 cm⁴+0.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)500 cm³499.81 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.67 cm4.65 cm+0.4%
Torsion constant (It)178 cm⁴180.6 cm⁴-1.4%

UB 533×210×122 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 21X83 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 21X83.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 21X83 has the larger second moment of area: 76,170 cm⁴ against 76,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (26.2 against 26.0 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 533×210×122 has a plastic modulus of 3200 cm³ and W 21X83 has 3211.9 cm³, a difference of only 0.4% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 533×210×122 is 122 kg/m and W 21X83 is 123.5 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 21X83 gives 3211.9 cm³ of plastic modulus and 76,170 cm⁴ of inertia against 3200 cm³ and 76,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 21X83, with a second moment of area of 76,170 cm⁴ against 76,000 cm⁴ (0.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 533×210×122 vs IPE O 550UB 533×210×122 vs HE 550 AAUB 533×210×122 vs S 20X96W 21X83 vs IPE O 550W 21X83 vs HE 550 AAW 21X83 vs S 20X96
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…