CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 24X103 vs IPE O 600

W 24X103 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; IPE O 600 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. W 24X103 carries more bending: 4588.4 cm³ of plastic modulus against 4470 cm³, 2.6% more. They weigh essentially the same, 153.3 kg/m and 154 kg/m. W 24X103 is deeper, 622.3 mm against 610 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 24X103
W
IPE O 600
IPE
Difference
Mass153.3 kg/m154 kg/m-0.5%
Depth622.3 mm610 mm+2.0%
Width228.6 mm224 mm+2.1%
Web thickness14 mm15 mm-6.7%
Flange thickness24.9 mm24 mm+3.7%
Area195.5 cm²197 cm²-0.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)124,869 cm⁴118,000 cm⁴+5.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)4,588.4 cm³4,470 cm³+2.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)4,014.8 cm³3,880 cm³+3.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)4,953 cm⁴4,520 cm⁴+9.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)680.06 cm³640 cm³+6.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.05 cm4.79 cm+5.4%
Torsion constant (It)294.3 cm⁴316 cm⁴-6.9%

W 24X103 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; IPE O 600 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE O 600.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 24X103 has the larger second moment of area: 124,869 cm⁴ against 118,000 cm⁴, a difference of 5.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 24X103 is the more efficient section: 29.9 against 29.0 cm³ per kg/m, 3.1% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, W 24X103 is the stronger section and W 24X103 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 24X103 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 4588.4 cm³ against 4470 cm³ - 2.6% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: W 24X103 is 153.3 kg/m and IPE O 600 is 154 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE O 600 gives 4470 cm³ of plastic modulus and 118,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 4588.4 cm³ and 124,869 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 24X103, with a second moment of area of 124,869 cm⁴ against 118,000 cm⁴ (5.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×305×149 vs IPE O 600UB 610×305×149 vs W 24X103W 24X104 vs IPE O 600W 24X103 vs S 24X106W 24X103 vs H-600x300x12x20-151
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…